• cadekat@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Ladies” can come across as sleazy, imo. And sometimes you’re in a situation where the class/status suggested by “lady” ends up sounding sarcastic.

    “Gals” implies a level of friendship, and “dames” is too old timey.

    It’s a tight rope walk of sounding too familiar/formal, implying old/young, or being insulting/demeaning… I conclude that we need a new word.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think we often forget about “young man” and “young woman.”

      When someone is too young to safely call a woman, “young woman” is quite a compliment and gives her the respect of an adult anyway. If someone is just barely too old to be called a girl, they will probably find it neutral enough. And if someone is much too old to be called a girl they will appreciate it as flattery.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hm. Calling someone young woman or young man - to my middle aged ass - means they are in trouble.

        Young man/young woman, haven’t your parents taught you proper manners? We eat salad with salad fork, not dessert one!

        (You get the gist)

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah some people will have that association. But only rarely will the grammar of the situation even match that at all.

          For example, let’s say you are the store manager and a customer has requested a refund. You call down to billing to see if they can hook it up, and you say “Hi, yeah this is Dave. I have a young woman here who received the wrong size shoe in her pickup order…”

          There’s no way for her to interpret that as “she’s in trouble.”

          In fact, to match the association you’re talking about, it pretty much has to be used in directly addressing the person. And how often do you begin a normal sentence by saying “Woman, sit tight - I’m going to get you a refund for this.”

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean call me weird, but in both of those situations one would use “a customer” instead.

            Dear customer, sit tight.

            Dave, I have a customer here…

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s an example for illustrative purposes. It illustrates the point about grammar I was making. Now you’re on another point about whether it’s even necessary to use a gendered term at all. I don’t really feel like running around in circles on this further.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I guess I can see some ways that “lady” or “ladies” could sound sleazy but I’m surprised if this is someone’s first or only association. “Lady” is literally a landed title, the equivalent of “Lord,” and the highly dignified counterpart to “gentleman.”

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        To quote the earlier comment:

        “woman” still feels too old/mature no matter how old I get

        • MohamedMoney@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes, I read that. I also read your comment und you concluded (somewhat jokingly, I know), that ‘we’ need a new word for ‘women’.

          My, now more elaborate, response to that is, that ‘we’ don’t need a new word, you should learn to use the perfectly cromulent available ones.