• BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Exactly!

    “Guys” is gender exclusion.

    “Nagging” is shaming women for asking someone to do what they committed to do.

    “Pussy” is gender bias that women are weak.

    It’s all bullshit.

    For those who defend the use of any of these because we know what they mean, stop being a little shit. Just change! It’s not that hard.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Idk, I’m not sure it’s really that deep in most modern vernacular. Out of all social issues, being critical of people using slang like this who don’t intentionally mean it to be gender exclusive or biased is a choice you can make. I just think there’s bigger issues facing women than “guys” and “pussy” slang.

      • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        It might not be the most pressing issue, but it is one of the ones we have the most direct control over changing. And it’s fucking easy to do.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          What I mean is that the vast majority of people using that slang in modern times aren’t associating it in the way you’re implying. The words virtually have no meaning in those contexts other than, guys = general term for any person present / pussy = being a coward. I get the root of it being sexist, but changing decades of slang when it isn’t actually that insulting is how we annoyed everyone. Marc Maron’s Panicked special covers this topic pretty well, I feel.

          • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            There’s plenty of people that find masculine default language insulting. I don’t expect people to change how they talk in general; but I find it wild how many people absolutely lose their shit over “Oh, please don’t include me in ‘you guys’.” or “Please don’t use man/dude/bro on me.”

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think anyone making meaningful efforts with material results in those areas probably gets a pass. For everyone else what’s their excuse?

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Betty White had a great take on “Pussy” forgive me not remembering it correctly, but she joked more than once that it’s strange to use that word to call someone weak, those things take a pounding and usually, ask for more!

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        I totally agree with her! Call someone balls or scrotum or something. As someone who’s old enough to have sat on one once, those fucking things are weak sauce! 😭😭😭

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          I do think calling someone a “scrotum” is an insult, but not one that implies being weak.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve always understood pussy (as in afraid, not the vagina meaning) to be related to cats?

      I love the “I call everyone dude” shtick being responded with “So you fuck dudes?”. Shuts those type up pretty quickly.

    • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nagging doesn’t always have to do with commitment.

      Hypothetically speaking, if I asked you for a cigarette every 15 seconds that would be considered nagging.