it’s all crap; this post was created to re-enforce the idea that leftists are infighting with each other when, in reality, the dispute is between leftists and liberals who think that they’re leftists.

considering that my body count is 4 digits; i think i should have super powers by now. lol

aka the sole reason why we can learn that our leaders are baby fucking/eating/killing monsters and every just collectively shrugs and pretends that they don’t see it like it’s a homeless person asking for money.

also: the propaganda does more heavy lifting. we’re at a stage now that we help spread this propaganda to each other instead of the gov’t doing it themselves; we’re doing that work for free and that’s funny considering how many are struggling to make ends meet. lol

tantrums don’t help anything.

you keep demanding a fucking statute that says “gov’t officials may refuse,” then act like you won when you don’t see it. that’s not how this works.

kim davis literally refused, stayed in office, and precedent did jack shit to stop her. the act didn’t close that loophole. it actually affirmed anti-marriage beliefs as “reasonable” and “due respect.” you think officials won’t notice that?

you also keep pretending section 6(b) is irrelevant because it says “nonprofits.” cute. but the point isn’t that it covers officials directly—it’s that the law carves out explicit refusal rights for one group based on “sincere belief,” and there’s nothing in the text stopping courts from extending that logic to the next one. that’s not misinformation. that’s a prediction. and you still haven’t shown it’s false.

calling someone a fascist because they quoted a law correctly and drew a conclusion you don’t like isn’t an argument. it’s a tantrum and your unhinged response is proof of it. you’re so busy screaming “bullshit” that you never actually proved it’s bullshit.

so no, i wasn’t wrong and you’re still pretending the fire isn’t real because the match hasn’t been entered into evidence.

you’re doing a lot of heavy lifting to avoid admitting you were wrong.

first off, my claim wasn’t “section 6(b) applies to gov’t officials.” i said biden has given permission for officials to refuse. you read “the act itself” as my only source, but i never said that was the sole source. you filled in the blank, then called me a fascist for it. solid work.

second, this idea that pre-biden precedent “forbade” gov’t officials from refusing to certify marriages? cute. ask kim davis how that ironclad precedent worked out. she straight-up refused, kept her job, and became a folk hero. so no, it wasn’t some pristine rule you’re pretending it was.

third, you breeze right past the part where i was right about the act expanding religious refusal rights for nonprofits, then pivot like that’s irrelevant. it’s not. because the logic doesn’t stay neatly in its lane. you carve out explicit statutory protection for one group’s “sincere beliefs,” and you think gov’t officials won’t notice? states will run with it, and they already are.

so no, it wasn’t “misinformation.” it was a prediction. and you still haven’t shown it’s false—just that you don’t like the delivery.

the source is the act itself; dig deeper into it:

“Diverse beliefs about the role of gender in marriage are held by reasonable and sincere people based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises. Therefore, Congress affirms that such people and their diverse beliefs are due proper respect.”

– The Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 8404) Section 2

“shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage. Any refusal under this subsection…shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.”

– The Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 8404) Section 6(b)

100% true; no misinformation there.

please identify where the misinformation is

And fuck all the people who have worked peacefully for it in the ensuing over half a century?

and pointlessly so, biden has given anyone permission for any gov’t official to refusal to certify or recognize a marriage by simply saying that it’s against their religion.

and it will be reversed without more bricks.

Your government buys them w your taxe money; you’re obligated to buy them.

you must be; mine just get really fat and learn how to make demands from me like cuddles and treats, but they never lose interest in small scurrying objects/creatures. lol

that’s why i adopt street cats; they’ll attack anything smaller than them that moves. lol

hard to argue w that. lol

capitalism is when greed goes unchecked

yes

i bet that they’re pretty tasty considering how many fine foods they get to eat. lol

but only one of them is trying to push late stage capitalism on venezuela, gaza, greenland and canada

truly, the biggest take away from this entire post; the american government has vindicated tankies so many times and in writing, but here we see people still cling on to their ignorance with a such zeal that it rival’s red-maga willful ignorance.

there’s extremely few leftists in the united states and even fewer of them are gun owners.

and overwhelming majority of gun owners are conservative and are also trump lovers; they support ice and i don’t doubt that a majority of ice members are the gun owners you’re referring to.