

Maybe Im just not understanding the point of the centaur analogy, but it seems more convoluting than it does useful. At least in comparison to just making the same points without the analogy.
The point of a good analogy is to make your broader points immediately register with the reader, not create an entirely new concept to explain

























It also gave us Pruitt-Igoe…
I think execution is a lot more important than the architectural style in the success or failure of projects in that era