I think that’s only if you are registering to vote in a different precinct, if you aren’t already on the voter rolls in that area. Basically whenever you move. I’m not sure how other countries handle it when you move.

Your country probably requires voter ID if you aren’t from the United States…

Is there a reason we should still be concerned about covid? My understanding is that it’s a mild illness at this point.

He might as well queue up the landlord maintenance bills as well, and the property tax freeze. Unless the goal is to get rid of the people who maintain the property (the landlord) and place the maintenance burden on people who rent. Now you need associations to manage shared expenses.

What does “statistically” mean to you?

Oh I thought you were saying that’s why Wendy’s was going out of business, because they didn’t pay their workers enough.

Eliminating opposition is an even simpler fix. It’s unlikely and it should be unlikely because that’s a dangerous road to go down.

How did stagnated wages hurt their sales?

Good thing they aren’t the final arbiter of truth, the all knowing, omniscient, all powerful enforcer of that which is true and just. But you aren’t either, so its good that you also don’t have that power.

Voter ID is a weird hill to die on. Most of the world requires it, for obvious reasons. It really shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

Yes, but none of the protesters were affiliated with the church or had any stake in the church at all.

That would make more sense if it were church members protesting against the policies of their own church.

Right but that implies nothing about a siege.

Siege is where you attack an established position, a stronghold, by surrounding it and cutting off supplies hoping to force a surrender.

This is why i don’t buy the conspiracy that he is still alive. I can’t imagine what the powers that be would have to gain by letting him live. He’s much too dangerous.

Not to nitpick, but wouldn’t the ice building technically be under siege?

You shouldn’t need a discriminatory law to allow it. Your resume speaks for itself. It might feel good to do something like this, but it’s flawed from the start and we shouldn’t start down that path.

Well you have to convict them first

Yes exactly, which is why rules like this should never pass.

Not to be that guy, but I can’t see this ever holding up or getting approved in the first place. As of now there is no way to discriminate based on previous occupation. The only legal grounds for job discrimination currently in California is based on being a sexual predator or violent felon. Even regular felons are allowed to be teachers. Not sure it’s a good idea to go down the path of allowing job discrimination based on what your previous job was, particularly when it’s a completely legal occupation.