Madrigal

Bug fixing is not a reason to enable massive privacy violations.

That much is true.

you can send it to a server

Yes, because web browsers, under current web architecture, allow this.

This is entirely my point.

That can all be done 100% client side. The server does not need this information.

Here’s the information a web server needs to deliver content to a browser:

• The requested resource
• An IP address
• User credentials (sometimes)

Everything else is a fucking security hole. There’s no good reason for servers to know what extensions you have installed, what OS you’re running, the dimensions of your browser window, where your mouse cursor is positioned, or any one of a thousand other data points that browsers freely hand over.

Still don’t really understand why browsers expose this data to sites.

Web browsers are just such a massive security hole.

The very concept of “parents’ rights” implies that children are some kind of property.

Children have rights. Parents have responsibilities.

How does one enter an older DOB without causing an underflow?

But…but Magic Box™

Gotta love a good strawman.

Yeah, isn’t it something like one in four pregnancies actually makes it to term, naturally?

I misread “purse” and ended up in a very different story.

Why promise to release files?

Because it takes time to fabricate them, even with AI.

Windows acts like it is the only OS installed on the machine. Your best bet is to physically disconnect all other drives while installing windows.

You think Lemmy is better? Mods here are engaging in the same shitty behaviours. Lack of moderator accountability is a serious issue on this platform.

Edit: brigading just proves my point, you dumb fucks.