FishFace

He’s attacking Venezuela and Iran, and threatening Cuba. None of that helps Russia.

The sanctions he’s lifting on Russia demonstrate how disastrous the war has been and do help Russia (as does an increase in oil prices). But cutting off a producer of Shaheds does not, isolating Russia on the world stage by hurting its allies does not, continuing to (mostly) allow Ukraine to use American intelligence does not, etc.

I dunno whether people who spout this are conspiracy brained or just don’t think about it much but either way, please think.

Yeah, “sharing information” on irrelevant Lemmy threads is going to make so much difference. You’re so brave.

I don’t waste time denying baseless accusations.

You misspelt slacktivism.

America sneezes and the whole world catches a cold - not just because you blow up international trade, but because you see your grievances as the most important thing, so that they are relevant in every situation, so we’ve all got to suffer through your self-absorption.

Do the internet equivalent of wearing a face mask.

You’re making it my problem to block every one of the thousands of people that post off-topic on their grievances in every light hearted thread, so no. I am going to make it your problem, because you’re being annoying and socially inept. I’m sorry that that’s not nice to hear, but I don’t say it to be cruel, only in the hopes of achieving a better outcome for everyone.

Restricting yourself to posting about privacy and politics in threads that are relevant is not a big ask.

Because nobody cares that people can tell what store they went to for some DIY supplies, and the OP isn’t even lauding the place.

We get it, it’s your special interest. It ain’t ours.

We’re all aware of what he’s done, doesn’t change the outcome.

Russia undoubtedly benefits the most, but not in the long run. Russia benefits from having allies.

Putin is not telling Trump to invade Putin’s ally, Iran. Even if it will hurt America, Putin does not want that, obviously.

Utterly brain-dead take.

Yeah, and beach landings are notoriously hard to oppose.

implying that Arch is niche at this point

That’s just where it’s stored. If it’s coming out of them (like, directly), then you need to see a doctor.

It should be coming out of your butt.

In general, needing something to do something you want to do is annoying.

So, you are unhinged and are treating this completely different than comparable situations.

We get it, you hate the company, for a variety of reasonable and unreasonable things.

And because of that, you hate all its users and have no qualms about assaulting them.

I no longer know which thread this is because voyager isn’t showing context, so if your reply was off the point I don’t gonna correct you.

The glasses aren’t designed to secretly take pictures. They’re designed to make it quite hard to take pictures secretly, by having an LED that comes on to notify others, and a mechanism to detect if the LED is covered.

So, if the light isn’t on, and if someone wearing them isn’t constantly rotating their head to look at you, are still beating them up?

Don’t have any, obviously 🙄

So, are you going to cut the conspiracy crap until you have evidence? Thought not.

And why will they think that? Is it because I may have a phone in my hand, because I do use a phone quite a lot, and they can be used to film people.

I didn’t grasp that by “recording” what you meant was “taking a picture every so often”, no.

How often, then are you saying they turn on the camera, focus and expose, capture the picture, wake up the SoC, and power the radio to send the data off somewhere?

Should be relatively easy to test this by monitoring current flow to the camera, right?

You think over 99% of people turning up for the meta glasses street brawl are in favour of punching people for wearing the wrong glasses?

No, but you likened lacking a GPU to lacking a care in terms of stuff you would thereby be unable to do. I was making the comparison explicit.

I certainly did not say that nobody needs a GPU for their work.