People are quite clear in their criticism of her based on the things she says she does. You’re trying to shift the conversation to something unrelated.
If criticisms of Rowling’s Transphobia are invalid they should be easy to dispute instead of trying to build an ad hominim Strawman.
They’re not clear at all. They’re histrionics. People don’t bother reading what she wrote. They read someone’s shit take worst possible interpretation of what she wrote
Then once again: that should be very easy to discredit. The fact that you have invented a strawman instead of addressing the criticisms actually being presented speaks volumes.
I’m looking forward to any reply you get because I honestly can’t understand the online hatred of her, apart from people making themselves feel good by believing they’re fighting the good fight or whatever.
Jkr is hated for the following;
Views on Sex and Gender: Rowling argues that “sex is real” and determines the lived reality of women, arguing that disregarding biological sex harms women’s rights.
“People who menstruate” Comment: In 2020, she criticized the phrase “people who menstruate,” which many deemed anti-trans, leading to criticism from LGBTQ groups.
Single-Sex Spaces: She has expressed concerns about transgender women accessing women-only spaces, such as bathrooms and changing rooms, citing her own experiences with sexual assault.
Legislative Opposition: Rowling has actively opposed reforms to gender recognition laws in Scotland, notes this BBC article.
Apparently because she dared to state her opinion, and even worse to support her own opinion that makes her evil incarnate.
Because views you don’t believe in are innately evil I guess, I don’t know because I’ve never heard a good reason why she shouldn’t be able to hold these views if she wants, or to spend her money how she wants.
Btw, she has donated over $250 million to various causes, primarily focusing on children’s welfare, Multiple Sclerosis research, and women’s rights.
Which laws and can you give me a source for what she said?
I’m not sure why she feels that that phrase is an attack on women, you’d have to ask her.
Although her point from looking online in that instance was that the word women should be used, because you know, only women menstruate.
Again, I asked what has she said about trans people? To the points you’ve brought up it seems that she is advocating for women, not against trans people.
I’m happy to be shown that she hates trans people but as of yet I haven’t received anything she actually said about trans people that was negative…
People are quite clear in their criticism of her based on the things she says she does. You’re trying to shift the conversation to something unrelated.
If criticisms of Rowling’s Transphobia are invalid they should be easy to dispute instead of trying to build an ad hominim Strawman.
They’re not clear at all. They’re histrionics. People don’t bother reading what she wrote. They read someone’s shit take worst possible interpretation of what she wrote
Then once again: that should be very easy to discredit. The fact that you have invented a strawman instead of addressing the criticisms actually being presented speaks volumes.
What criticisms do you have that aren’t histrionics?
I’m looking forward to any reply you get because I honestly can’t understand the online hatred of her, apart from people making themselves feel good by believing they’re fighting the good fight or whatever.
Jkr is hated for the following;
Views on Sex and Gender: Rowling argues that “sex is real” and determines the lived reality of women, arguing that disregarding biological sex harms women’s rights.
“People who menstruate” Comment: In 2020, she criticized the phrase “people who menstruate,” which many deemed anti-trans, leading to criticism from LGBTQ groups.
Single-Sex Spaces: She has expressed concerns about transgender women accessing women-only spaces, such as bathrooms and changing rooms, citing her own experiences with sexual assault.
Legislative Opposition: Rowling has actively opposed reforms to gender recognition laws in Scotland, notes this BBC article.
Apparently because she dared to state her opinion, and even worse to support her own opinion that makes her evil incarnate.
Because views you don’t believe in are innately evil I guess, I don’t know because I’ve never heard a good reason why she shouldn’t be able to hold these views if she wants, or to spend her money how she wants.
Btw, she has donated over $250 million to various causes, primarily focusing on children’s welfare, Multiple Sclerosis research, and women’s rights.
Truly evil…
“sure, she has said all these bigoted things, I don’t see the problem with it.”
Then I can’t help you.
Removed by mod
She has been outspoken against anti-hate speech laws that would protect trans people.
Can you please explain how a reasonable person interprets the phrase “people who menstruate” as an attack on women?
Which laws and can you give me a source for what she said?
I’m not sure why she feels that that phrase is an attack on women, you’d have to ask her.
Although her point from looking online in that instance was that the word women should be used, because you know, only women menstruate.
Again, I asked what has she said about trans people? To the points you’ve brought up it seems that she is advocating for women, not against trans people.
I’m happy to be shown that she hates trans people but as of yet I haven’t received anything she actually said about trans people that was negative…