My definition of terrorism would very clearly and unequivocally say that planting a bomb on a diplomat’s ship is an act of terrorism. That’s a very standard definition and straightforward case. The meaning has not “changed,” such an act would always have been considered terrorism.
This whole question of whether it’s still considered terrorism when a state does it or whether we should call that something else, is just because you disputed that definition, saying that terrorism is when you harm the populace. I just pointed out that Garak also harmed the populace, and that Kira, who you do consider a terrorist, did not. Include acts conducted by states, don’t include them, either way, Garak did both.
My definition of terrorism would very clearly and unequivocally say that planting a bomb on a diplomat’s ship is an act of terrorism. That’s a very standard definition and straightforward case. The meaning has not “changed,” such an act would always have been considered terrorism.
This whole question of whether it’s still considered terrorism when a state does it or whether we should call that something else, is just because you disputed that definition, saying that terrorism is when you harm the populace. I just pointed out that Garak also harmed the populace, and that Kira, who you do consider a terrorist, did not. Include acts conducted by states, don’t include them, either way, Garak did both.