• Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t think you’re educated on the matter because landing on the moon with the mission plan that they set out requires the lunar gateway to be in place, it is not and likely won’t be for a long time. It was going to be impossible to land on the moon by the third mission (unless significantly delayed) no matter who was in charge. Like all ambitious space missions in history, it will be delayed, delayed, and delayed again. Sadly that’s how it has always been.

    You shouldn’t confidently spout incorrect information

    “The aerospace safety advisory panel recommended that Nasa rethink its objectives for Artemis III, … The panel said that the call for a revision was urgent, “given the demanding mission goals”.”

    The fucking safety advisory panel suggested the change moron dude, not Isaac. But yes fuck Elon cuck the pos ket head

    Edit: removed unnecessarily rude words, sorry I’m just an asshole

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Like all ambitious space missions in history, it will be delayed, delayed, and delayed again. Sadly that’s how it has always been.

      Unless I’m grossly mistaken, Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo were pretty much on schedule. I don’t know about Skylab, if we consider it separate from Apollo. I think things started to become less tight with STS (Shuttle).

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You could be right. I have not been alive that long and I must admit I’m not super educated on the exact timelines of many older programs. But in my lifetime, all the exciting programs have been delayed by a lot.

        I guess I confidently spouted some incorrect information if you were right.