You got them on a technicality. But multiple test articles have pretty much reached orbit, intentionally just missing orbit so they would re enter in a known location should something go wrong, and something has gone wrong most of the time.

I’m excited for the staship program because it’s the most exciting spaceflight development in my lifetime, yes fuck Elon but that doesn’t change the facts of how exciting the program is for a space lover. The upcoming launches with v3 hardware are going to be very exciting, hopefully most of the kinks have been resolved.

The more pressing issue IMO is that they haven’t really shown any of the moon landing hardware, which will be substantially different than the Starship articles they are using for testing now.

I don’t think you’re educated on the matter because landing on the moon with the mission plan that they set out requires the lunar gateway to be in place, it is not and likely won’t be for a long time. It was going to be impossible to land on the moon by the third mission (unless significantly delayed) no matter who was in charge. Like all ambitious space missions in history, it will be delayed, delayed, and delayed again. Sadly that’s how it has always been.

You shouldn’t confidently spout incorrect information

“The aerospace safety advisory panel recommended that Nasa rethink its objectives for Artemis III, … The panel said that the call for a revision was urgent, “given the demanding mission goals”.”

The fucking safety advisory panel suggested the change moron dude, not Isaac. But yes fuck Elon cuck the pos ket head

Edit: removed unnecessarily rude words, sorry I’m just an asshole

Appreciate your explanation!

Good thing this will be unenforceable for open source software, or at least things can be forked if they are maintained by bigger companies that need to comply.

Same, my unraid server is over 40 tb but I only have ~1.5 tb of critical data, being my immich photos and some files. I have an on site and off site raspberry pi with 4tb nvme SSD for nightly backups

Open source software like GrapheneOS is the only software you should ever trust to not be government spyware.

Nature is cruel, and that includes humans in general. I feel like that’s a known fact

It was actually the neck, lots of gushing

You’ve gotten some answers already, but truly the main reason is to attempt to make your butt look better/more attractive.

The guy was charged with voyeurism. From my quick googling, it seems like the laws say to be charged you have to be spying on someone or recording/photographing them, so I still don’t see how this is against the law, but it’s obviously gross.

Edit, I guess this is probably the part that he’s charged with so maybe makes sense.

"The elements of voyeurism under R.C. 2907.08 require proof beyond all reasonable doubt that the defendant:

(A) for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying the defendant committed trespass or surreptitiously invaded the privacy of another to spy or eavesdrop upon another person;"

A large portion of people are stupid, it’s sad

Bitwarden with a vaultwarden docker container on my home server. Access over a VPS.

You’re getting downvoted, but I agree. Sadly, I don’t think a woman will win the presidential election in the U.S. for at least another decade or two. Too many sexists, and subconscious misogyny

Broadly speaking, yes, and it’ll keep going until they run out of money. However, I think there is a very small chance that one of the companies is able to make a breakthrough probably with a different kind of architecture than our current LLMs that does get us to models that make genuine discoveries and breakthroughs.

Very unlikely though.

I’m pretty sure the massive buildout is for training new models not for compute power for end users. Their justification is they need more compute to get the superhuman level intelligence AIs that they have been claiming. So if that pans out their probably gonna be fine, but seems unlikely that’ll pan out how they want it to

The details on how it works from the website for those reading this chain.

"how does this work

k-id, the age verification provider discord uses doesn’t store or send your face to the server. instead, it sends a bunch of metadata about your face and general process details. while this is good for your privacy (well, considering some other providers send actual videos of your face to their servers), its also bad for them, because we can just send legitimate looking metadata to their servers and they have no way to tell its not legitimate. while this was easy in the past, k-id’s partner for face verification (faceassure) has made this significantly harder to achieve after amplitudes k-id verifier was released, (which doesn’t work anymore because of it.)

with discord’s decision of making the age verification requirement global, we decided to look into it again to see if we can bypass the new checks. step 1: encrypted_payload and auth_tag

the first thing we noticed that the old implementation doesn’t send when comparing a legitimate request payload with a generated one, is its missing encrypted_payload, auth_tag, timestamp and iv in the body.

looking at the code, this appears to be a simple AES-GCM cipher with the key being nonce + timestamp + transaction_id, derived using HKDF (sha256). we can easily replicate this and also create the missing parameters in our generated output. step 2: prediction data

heres where it kind of gets tricky, even after perfectly replicating the encryption, our verification attempt still doesn’t succeed, so they must also be doing checks on the actual payload.

after some trial and error, we narrowed the checked part to the prediction arrays, which are outputs, primaryOutputs and raws.

turns out, both outputs and primaryOutputs are generated from raws. basically, the raw numbers are mapped to age outputs, and then the outliers get removed with z-score (once for primaryOutputs and twice for outputs).

there is also some other differences:

XScaledShiftAmt and yScaledShiftAmt in predictions are not random but rather can be one of two values It is checked that the media name (camera) matches one of your media devices in the array of devices It is checked if the states completion times match the state timeline

with all of that done, we can officially verify our age as an adult. all of this code is open source and available on github, so you can actually see how we do this exactly."

Same here, been hating on Discord from day one since you are the product with free services.

I do a significant amount of computing on my desktop, but yeah, social media, and by that I mean only Lemmy. I really only use on my phone when I’m away from my computer.

No just voice channels, I’m glad they have them but it was completely missing from their marketing on the website. Just says “text channels done right” and there isn’t a single line about voice support

Edit, found a reddit post from about a month ago which is copied below. So it looks like it barely supports voice so far.

"Apparently The voice chat feature has been brought back in stoat

It only works in the desktop version though. Mobile devices you’re going to have to wait a bit longer though.

Otherwise the quality of it is really really good but you will experience a massive delay in your voice being sent through the voice medium. It’s about 800 millisecond delay even with the fastest speeds. But at least it’s something. "

GitHub issue on the topic

No VOIP? That’s the only reason I ever use discord, when my friends force me to so I can talk while we play games. Guess teamspeak is still king