What ever happened to predictability?
Odd perspective. What kind of lens was this taken with.
Not sure about lens but this looks like a tilt shift photo
I don’t think it’s tilt shifted because it doesn’t have the edge blur, I think it’s just a really big altitude photo taken with a zoom lens and colour saturated to death
Kinda looks like that, but it’s missing the DoF.
Pretty city for tourists visiting the tourist areas.
A different story if trying to live in it. I used to like the idea of living and working there, until I saw the costs of living.
San fran is great, some of the prettiest coastline and amazing food
I can’t remember the last time I was there when it was sunny though
At the top you can see the disused Alameda Naval Air Base runway, which is where the MythBusters filmed a lot of their antics.
Also, the Matrix Reloaded freeway loop.
Now it’s the largest parking lot in the Bay.
I think that little island there is Alcatraz.
You are correct.
deleted by creator
Pff… I can swim that!
I first thought this pic was showing flooding or higher water levels. Nice overview shot.
This perspective is extra trippy because the port of Oakland and Naval Air Station Alameda are both so incomprehensibly huge on a human scale. You have an awareness and feeling for how big a city and skyscrapers are, so to see them in this perspective get made to look so small and so close to these expanses of concrete is mind bending.
With a telephoto lens no less. Must have been really far away with a long lens to get it to look so flat.
The photo must be around 8 years old.
Fun fact: on the top left corner is a partial segment of the old Bay Bridge that was damaged during the Loma Prieta 1989 earthquake. They built a whole new span (the white section next to it). To get rid of the old concrete underwater pylons, they blew them all up underwater. Here’s a video of the implosion of the last two:
https://blog.bayareametro.gov/posts/final-implosion-old-bay-bridge
deleted by creator
Looks like SimCity 2000
Except that one bridge to connect industrial and residential seems a major bottleneck.
First thing i thought!
Dense industrial, light residential… a lot is there!
Is this tilt shifted? Looks unreal?
It’s Maxar satellite imagery with a high off-nadir angle. European Space Imaging use it as an example in this article about ONA.
Thanks for the page. Was very interesting to read!
Really useful article. Rare to read something that actually does a decent job explaining the background from someplace wanting to sell you something.
Very cool. Learned something new today. Thank you.
I looked it up on google earth and the perspective is very distorted. The shot is probably 8 times as long as it is wide
This prob looked really pretty before all the concrete.
Meh, it was mostly just sand dunes, at least for San Francisco. There’s probably more trees there now then before it was developed. Also San Francisco probably has the most natural area surrounding it then any other major city in the US, since most of the area around it is either mountains or water which you can’t build on, that’s also why it’s so dense.
Oh thank god they build some skyscrapers then.
Unironnically yes, conservation wise skyscrapers are the best way for people to live. Squeezing people onto the smallest footprint possible per person is the best way to keep spaces natural, besides killing large chunks of the human population…
Plus doing away with cattle. (Yeah, c’mon.)
