4+ years old Wikipedia vandalism

Ah, well I don’t have that issue.

I don’t know what you’re referring to.

Dilbert from August 1991:

The article says “sometimes provide less-accurate and less-truthful responses to users who have lower English proficiency”. This is what I was commenting on. I don’t have enough understanding to comment on your case.

I mean… isn’t it just logical that if you express yourself ambiguously, you are more likely to get a poor response? Humans and chatbots alike need clarity to respond appropriately. I don’t think we can ever expect things to work differently.

That’s a somewhat odd statement coming from a stranger on the internet but I’m having one of those days where I’ll take anything that’s on offer. So thanks, I think I needed to hear that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs

Graeber states that more than half of societal work is pointless, both large parts of some jobs and five types of entirely pointless jobs:

• Flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, store greeters;
• Goons, who act to harm or deceive others on behalf of their employer, or to prevent other goons from doing so, e.g., lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists;
• Duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed permanently, e.g., programmers repairing shoddy code, airline desk staff who calm passengers with lost luggage;
• Box tickers, who create the appearance that something useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate compliance officers, academic administration;[14]
• Taskmasters, who create extra work for those who do not need it, e.g., middle management, leadership professionals.[1][4]

People say they slept like a baby, but have you ever slept like a hamster?

I mean I’d do it for the good of mankind. Except I wouldn’t actually be watching.

I mean if they’re reading books in the first place you’re probably already in the clear

Phrasing!

On that we agree.

The left is realizing that. The problem is that the right isn’t.

I’m unsure how most of what you said relates to the parent comment. Did you forget to drink your coffee before commenting?

You: Cool! The entrance to the subway is around the corner.

Bob: Thanks for the help, friend!

You: You’re welcome! Good luck.

Not great, not terrible

But the article is about what material is used as a conductor

Are you implying that gold isolates better from interference than copper?