Nah sent it back due to the lack of stand. Settled on an eco show 15 and a big analog whiteboard

Wanted a big calendar and board to sketch ideas and stuff (I was making $40k/month at the time - Covid bull run).

Sent it back because I was annoyed at the lack of stand.

ADHD

Mods can’t handle the truth

I bought an electronic whiteboard for like 10k

It arrived without a stand (it had a stand in the photo, but the small print said it was sold separately).

Dogpiles are worse here than Reddit for going against the hive mind. People love downvoting.

Unfortunately for them downvotes can’t stop me here 🖕🖕

Removed by mod

You brought it up lol

Vegetarians are still carnists and it doesn’t give you any additional credibility, no. Less in my eyes on the ethical front.

It’s not a vaguely related topic. It’s the same one, avoidable purchases which support environmental destruction. If it’s the environmental destruction that concerns you I’d hope you’d cut out the #1 avoidable cause before getting on a pedestal. Eating animals provides no benefits whereas using AI does, as evident from that Linux game thingie developer who got dogpilled on here the other day for saying he used ai to help him get over burnout.

Yes as I had this discussion with someone the other week.

The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis

A peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 51 studies found that ChatGPT has a large positive effect on students’ learning performance, and moderate positive effects on learning perception and higher-order thinking skills (like analysis and synthesis) across educational contexts.

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development

Research published in the journal Education Sciences reports that AI in educational contexts can lead to personalized learning, improved academic outcomes, and increased engagement, with many students reporting enhanced learning efficiency.

Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review

Ai tools support problem-solving skills, collaboration, and instructional quality in meaningful ways.

I see the flaw in your reasoning, yes.

Going vegan isn’t equivalent to killing yourself. Just eat beans mate it’s easy.

Removed by mod

Yes of course. There is no moral issue.

IP is a scam, and the environmental impact is overblown.

I trust everyone foaming at the mouth about ai is vegan because eating animals is way more destructive.

Fuck sake just giving maga more ammo to smear the media as untrustworthy.

If youve discovered anything I’ve not covered on Trump let me know and I’ll add it to the trumpfilesindex!

I mean it’s a fair suggestion, multiple Epstein victims making allegations against Trump aint coincdence. The title is just straight up misinformation though - implying the estate paid the victim a settlement for Trump. Or is that what you mean, they’re assuming that’s what it was for because he’s guilty?

The only question is are newsweek incompetent or malicious - publishing that title and letting it stay up? I can’t figure out what the hell they meant by it, just seems straight up wrong.

deleted by creator

Yes this is The South Carolina Witness

Not sure what that title is all about though, it makes it sound like they paid a settlement for Trump, when the body of the text doesn’t claim that.

What it should say is ‘Epstein’s estate paid a settlement to a person who also accused Trump’

It also goes on about the fund, but court records show she was ineligible for the compensation program, her attorney told The Post and Courier that she got a settlement directly from Epstein’s estate.

trumpfilesindex.org

Getting there 🫡