Clinically depressed, chronically online,
Socialist discordian statist for open science,
Independent journalism and gay crime.

My Communities:

[email protected] — Independent world journalism news feed.

[email protected] — Independent news from Canada.

[email protected] — Trash. Global, diverse news, reports, blogs and listicles.

[email protected] — Ask, share, learn and show off with the most DIY of artists.

[email protected] — For cool rocks.

[email protected] — For everyday socialism.

I keep making communities. Please help.

This is my main account.

Other Me:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Former Me:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Land back. Do drugs.

  • 4 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 4th, 2025

help-circle


  • It’s odd to believe the universe is deterministic when physics experiments have observed particles that exist outside causality. Even the double slit experiment goes against causality, uncertainty goes against causality, even current particle experiments can’t prove deterministic causality. The prevailing scientific and philosophical findings are that universal, deterministic causality can’t be proved any more than the existence of god.


  • I’d start with Uncertainty: Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr, and the Struggle for the Soul of Science. You sound like you’ve probably read A Brief History of Time - but there are edits in later editions and we’ve learned more since Hawking’s death.

    Then: Rethinking Causality in Quantum Mechanics. And: Nothing, put out by New Scientist in 2013 — pretty cool, but doesn’t really deal with causality. I just liked that one.

    Anyway, you’re arguing in favor of a deterministic universe, but as far as I know with my (limited) understanding, that’s more of a philosophical question that can’t be proved or disproved. We lack the ability to track every particle to its origin, and the inverse is a negative — and you can’t prove something doesn’t happen, only it’s likelihood.