• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • You’re very obviously not defending tipping culture. I am defending tipping culture as an organic solution to a structural issue. Is it a good solution? Not really, but more equitable than not tipping in the current state of society.

    Your argument so far (as it reads by me) appears to suggest we should all stop tipping and the market will magically correct itself because (sometimes?) you go to a coffee shop that chooses to be more internally equitable.

    I want to believe you have some plan as to how we get to a situation where restaurants (like McDonalds) are expected to pay a living wage, but right now, hoping that they do it voluntarily strains credibility.

    Can you give me more of what you propose than “maybe not tipping is better” and “I know of a restaurant that voluntarily fixed this issue”.


  • TeddE@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldSad but true
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t see the problem:

    According to my rudimentary research, the average franchise owner makes $118,00 / year (take home, after other things are accounted for). If you break that into 52 weeks and 40 hour work weeks, that suggests a (very rough) $52/hour.

    https://franchisebusinessreview.com/post/how-much-franchise-owners-make/

    And your argument is that sometimes the service worker can make as much as that, if they are tipped successfully.

    I personally think that - while I would prefer to live in a world where a living wage was guaranteed and we could honorably discard tipping culture - in lieu of such regulation, this seems preferable to management making that same profit and the worker being offered poverty wages.


  • TeddE@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldSad but true
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Correct, the customer benefits from enabling the employer to deprive th employee of a living wage. Their patronage facilitates the practice.

    So yes, the customer is not a beneficiary of tipping culture, but they benefit by ignoring tipping culture at the cost of employees (in absence of robust living wage regulations or practices).








  • They don’t own it, the individual posters own the content of their own posts, however, from the reddit terms of service:

    When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit.

    And with each of those rights granted, Reddit’s lawyers can defend those rights. So no, they don’t own it “just because they ran the servers” - they own specific rights to copy granted to them by each poster.

    (I don’t like this arrangement, but ignorance of the terms of service isn’t going to help someone who uploaded a full copy of the works they have extensive rights to) On this subject I think there needs to be an extensive overhaul to narrow what terms you can extend to the general public. The problem is I straight up don’t trust anyone currently in power to make such a change to have our interests in mind.







  • No, I don’t think that’s what’s happening here. I think people are theorizing that X is very likely to respond to pressure from Google and Apple threatening to deplatform them, and loudly complaining about them not applying their own rules equally is a great way to remind their internal lawyers to put pressure on them (insulting the CEOs is just a nice bonus).

    Frankly, if the fallot here is a relaxed adult policy, that’s still a win. LGBTQIA advocacy groups tend to get lumped in as ‘adult’, which is a problem for trans-affirming suicide prevention hotlines trying to save lives.

    As for your slippery slope question, that Pandora’s box is already open. Just half a year ago Mastercard and VISA put the strongarm on Valve and itch.io to let the payment processors ban any game they choose under the guise of pornography censorship. Pressuring a platform to censure an app ‘for the sake of the children’ just isn’t the virgin ground you seem to think it is.


  • I think avenue Q said it best, “The internet is for porn”.

    Sure, PornHub is not the only thing you can do on the Internet. Some of the more formal studies are functionally run by marketing groups, who are likely more skewed to advertising demographics.

    Example: the fundamental backbone of the internet upgraded as part of the CERN Large Hadron Collider project construction, to distribute the massive amount research data being generated to scientists across the world - but Cloudflare doesn’t count that traffic when preparing it’s statistics)

    All I’m saying is: you could do a lot worse than PornHub as a research authority for trends in this subject.



  • TeddE@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldCollege Degrees
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Get off my lawn”

    Please stop doing something that artists have doing since practically the invention of paper

    Tell me, what new medium is ruining the kids today?

    Is it low-effort? Sure. But so are boobs and farts and piss. Artists got to get practice in drawing something, doesn’t hurt anyone but your fefes if they use a meme.

    Heck, for the context of this tired argument, I wouldn’t even care if it’s AI. (And I broadly do not like AI)