

The tool I referenced is just an archive search engine. It searches for unblocked copies of the article. It’s not a mechanical “paywall remover” in the literal sense.


The tool I referenced is just an archive search engine. It searches for unblocked copies of the article. It’s not a mechanical “paywall remover” in the literal sense.


What’s a hard paywall? Again, it’s has never failed me. It works fine on OP’s article. Can you show me one it doesn’t work for?


Try https://removepaywalls.com/. I’ve never had it fail for me.
Scam calls and texts always use call ID spoofing. Blocking them would be easy if they used their actual number.


The photo in the post doesn’t look like the adapter I remember. The originals didn’t have radial bars behind each spring. Only the new ones on amazon do.



“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”- Hunter S. Thompson


The article makes several bold statements and cites zero sources. I don’t see any reason to believe it.


Whenever I visit a grocery store that requires a phone number for member number it’s (area) 867-5309
“Following a comprehensive review, we determined the planned Flock Safety integration would require significantly more time and resources than anticipated,” Ring wrote in a blog post. “As a result, we have made the joint decision to cancel the planned integration.”
Not necessarily because of privacy concerns.