I mean if it saves her from our version of the Nuremberg trials cause she says that she wasnt involved and then can get elected after they are gone acting as a standard fiscal and racially conservative Republican she could be a major member of the party for decades like McCain.
It really might pay dividends to be rembered as crazy and cowardly than a fascist pedophile protector.
Well MTG did at least call MAGA a lie to enrich the wealthy. So at least there is that heavy enough turn.
You are right to think she doesnt necessarily want her own demons said which is why everyone in Washington has blackmail on them to keep in line but also, since she read the files, MTG might just not want to speak out cause she knows what Trump does to women considering the bodies allegedly in his wake.
I mean she has always been a grifter but she’s poor and thought she had an in with the GOP to enrich herself like many in both parties have done before and still.
Now the interesting thing is that she’s moving to this side of the argument. She is basically a “fair weather” grifter, so it says something that she thinks the wind is blowing this way.
Also, wild that she listens to her constituents more than Harris proved to. So weird second check mark for the racist bigot. Man people sure aren’t easy to single categorize when they aren’t Trump.
Yeah its a shame the american system incentivizes people to accept corruption u til they can build a financial safety net for the self to replace a social one to be able to speak out about issues they see within their workspace.
It basically makes everyone dirty and treats them like they are untrustworthy and double standarding just because they “now” choose to speak out minimizing some of the very real issues.
Truly some amazing musicians, could complain about his mom dancing with his best friend to a song about depression and not miss a single note.
My mom was a drunk and would be unreliable for food and the stuff she made was often bad so if I wanted to eat I needed to figure something out. My first real cooking experience was trying to impress her with a nice meal and it worked. The monster liked me, and food was a great answer for making a bad situation better.
After that it has been… Whatever works. I talk to people about their tricks and try cuisine I might not otherwise like cause it is good to know. Get cookbooks and watch cooking shows sure but also exploring the concepts behind how and why. I chose to learn basics. Why something turns out the way it does from the way you cook it (poached, baked, broiled, fried) and then add to it and adjust.
Humans are great puzzle solvers and cooking is a personal puzzle for what tastes good and what you have to work with. Get the basics down and then be ok with mistakes.
But then it is easier to hate… Why do we have to make it so complicated by acknowledging it isn’t so simple?
Everyone else is just 100% morally wrong unlike me. ｡°(°¯᷄◠¯᷅°)°｡
You are working backwards to find the answer you want to just simplify people into being as bad as you want them to be.
Don’t just take the easy lazy logic or you will dirty yourself too into looking as racist and misogynistic yourself by saying those words aloud for others.
We have 2 years to find a candidate who doesnt try to fix systemic and financial issues with changing social structures.
Money. He brags about he is good at getting it like he was a fiscal conservative.
No, its that people like you that don’t want to know anything else still are hearing about a fraction of the efforts.
The fact that despite your best efforts of being ignorant you, and people like you are being clued into the conversation even if just to try to troll it down means it is at least reaching the basement dwellers. And that implies a pretty long reach.
You are responding right now. The conversation is being had. You hear plenty.
Why is a shock that I don’t want pedophiles and corrupt backwater deal people running my country?
Your lack of awareness does not extend to everyone else and you seem to be waiting for others to do enough work to give you an easy candidate that already has everything figured out.
Well we are trying so you can stop complaining and ignore us till we do then. I do not need nor care for your input or lack of effort.
I disagree. Not about the party loyalty to republicans but to the idea that people drop leaders for some perceived purity test.
I think it is a useful myth that excuses the behavior without looking into it more.
People want leaders that support and help them the individual. We are focusing on social ideology instead of financial which is the primary driving factor for Republican voters too. They are just more communal and expect members of their perceived community to be helpful to them and are taught to leave it to a higher power to solve.
Anyways, the Democratic party is not picking policy that is big tent. They are picking stuff that is hyper specific sub groups based on cultural aspects and invites awareness of whether you are in or not. It makes it appear fractured cause we are rallied as sub cultures under a fiscal conservative umbrella. If the policies were pushed as supporting the financially underserved it would be easier to recognize yourself as belonging but it would impact the financial support of billionaires which the party actually courts.
It appears we can’t win cause we are trying to play the same policies the republicans do under a guise of social structures need to be fixed instead of financial ones. Push for policies that are big tent and makes it easy to the average person to see them belonging in (poor) and thr support will come but the policies will need to change to. So which comes first?
It needs to be politicians cause no one will trust to elect the other way around.
You did a bad job of challenging or conversing. You have been singular sided the whole time.
You are toxic, at least specifically to this entire thread so far. And I am plenty happy to add to that so you maybe hear it.
I like trying to simplify stuff to basic language and I am happy it was helpful
Wider open you let in more light, and want faster shutter speed, more closed you get less light and want a longer shutter speed.
And f stops work backwards. Think of it as percent of sensor covered. The bigger the number the more covered it is and the smaller the hole/aperture.
Duh, Obama didnt win on saying he was gonna continue status quo. No Democrat actually has even properly won contested in 26 years now with that campaign promise.
We have to keep pretending that is what people want to excuse doing nothing to appease the scammers and business men who can’t afford to have things change and learn how to make a new profit.
People want a fake past to return to or a brighter future. More of the same is killing us.