

Well, he did leave you another option.


Well, he did leave you another option.
Imagine spending your time being intentionally obtuse about the colloquial understanding of “America” and then calling other people “lame ass trolls.” C’mon man. Be better.

Funny, if I had to choose between Randy Fine and a dog, I don’t think it would be a particularly hard choice either.
The difference however, is that I’m judging someone on their words and actions, not an obtuse understanding of cultural and religious affiliations. Because that would be racist, much like Randy.

If everyone on this list gave the same percentage as Warren Buffett, the world would be a visibly better place.
Edit: To be clear, I am of the opinion that no one should be as rich as Warren Buffet, but I simply wanted to make the point that even as much as one third of all their wealth would visibly change the world, while leaving these people with a dragon’s hoard of wealth.


It was the golden age of white privelege. They’ll do anything to get back there.


I dislike people normalizing hate speech through this kind of space, but I largely agree. If people want to follow a curator that will make sure they aren’t emotionally blindsided by a female protagonist showing affection towards another woman, for example, that’s a choice they can make. We wouldn’t want the chuds to get their feelings hurt, afterall.
But in all seriousness, that’s kind of their choice. Obviously, any comments that suggest violence against people who make/play/are represented in that kind of game needs to get shut down immediately, but you’re allowed to not like LGBTQ+ representation. It’s not illegal to clutch your pearls at the sight of non-heteronormative sexuality. It’s just reprehensible.


I occasionally go through the lists posted by chud curators for small indie titles that would have escaped my notice. I don’t have time to scrutinize every title on Steam, but these guys seemingly have infinite time to ensure every unheard of title with a case of LGBTQ+ representation gets criticism from them. Ironically, they’re fantastic for finding small, progressive passion projects I would have otherwise missed.
While I appreciate the personal anecdote, what was the cost paid by your insurer? Being covered by private insurance is great for you, but what happens to the people without the means?
The subtext of your post is an insinuation that it isn’t as bad as others make it out to be, but it sounds like it wasn’t bad for you because you have good private insurance, and the means to obtain and manage that insurance. Not everyone is in that situation, and those who don’t have access to good private insurance, or simply make a mistake in managing their insurance, shouldn’t be forced to pay absurd fees out of debt/pocket.
Unfortunately, gotta hard disagree here. The big problem is that this particular in-group does have a shared ideology and moral framework. The problem is that it’s Nazi ideology.


The only way to get around this would be to verify your age, which Discord says can be accomplished in one of two ways. The first is to “submit a form of identification” to Discord vendors (i.e. scan your physical ID), or to use “facial age estimation.” Discord says that the latter process happens fully on-device, as “video selfies for facial age estimation never leave a user’s device.” For ID scans, Discord says that documents “are deleted quickly.”
Between the features that are limiting being almost entirely things I don’t want anyway (random friend invites are literally just fucking scams and ads to begin with), and the entire process being completed on-device… What is this, some slow news day? Everyone is losing their minds about this being some insane overstep like Discord is asking for a blood sample, or even a photo of your driver’s license.
Don’t get me wrong, fuck this age verification nonsense, but it’s pretty clear this is some very specific government regulatory appeasement where Discord is attempting to avoid culpability for holding data at basically every juncture possible. They already have the useful, farmable data, like geolocation, age/gender demographics and interests. They don’t want our government ID. They only want a “yes” or “no” from their app.
Must be a slow news day. Everyone’s blowing this up in headlines for cheap clicks.
Fair enough. His ethnic background has to do with only a tiny minority of the crimes he enabled, then.
But, again, being Jewish isn’t the crime. Being a zionist is. Conflating the two is just racism.
Let me re-emphasize then: Epstein showed no indication of caring how many sources the money was coming from. Being a pro-isreal, zionist piece of shit doesn’t disclude him from being a Russian asset, and the insinuation that “he was Jewish so he MUST be a zionist” is, in fact, anti-semitism.
Don’t get me wrong, zionist trash should be named as such, but “he is Jewish” is not an argument. It’s racism.
What the fuck is this anti-semitist trash rolling around Lemmy right now.
Epstein did not give a flying fuck who the money was coming from and his ethnic background has nothing to do with the crimes he enabled, you propaganda spreading fuck.
Not bothering to cover up your crimes isn’t the flex you seen to think it is.


Make racists feel embarrassed again.

But if the rapture is on Monday, who’s going to the potluck on Tuesday?


videos show federal agents apparently discovering and removing during the altercation that led to his death. Videos do not appear to show Pretti holding the weapon during that confrontation.
He died because he’s the kind of person ICE fears most: someone who was willing to defend themselves, and knew how to do so legally.
I fucking hate stroads.


The first time around, in 2016, there were a lot of “Trump will be great for the economy” takes. There were many unknowns at the time, so I can forgive people who believed that then. By the time 2024 came around, anyone with a pulse - or anyone who hadn’t attached their entire ego to him - knew better.
People so “left” they wrap right back around to merit-based authoritarianism.