• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What concerns me is the implicit association people will make between him and FOSS, and anything they believe about one will carry to the other.

    I have to assume there are already people who hear “Linux” and think “ugh, I wouldn’t touch that with a 10ft pole because I don’t want anything to do with Pewdiepie”. Similarly, if he says something dumb next week, and half his audience abandons him, they’ll likely have a negative outlook on FOSS going forward.

    Either way, I don’t believe FOSS’ staying power comes from meteoric rises following a fad, it comes from a natural immunity to enshittification over time. On the scale of a few of decades, FOSS seems like it’s struggling against proprietary solutions. But just like the general concept of political democracy, I think on the scale of centuries it will become the clear, time-tested, least-bad option. But I digress.

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      it comes from a natural immunity to enshittification over time.

      ugh, tell me that if this bullshit with systemd and age verification isn’t true.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s already solved: FOSS means I can always fork/build my own package that does what I want. That’s why I mean it’s immune.

    • QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Eh, don’t worry about it. If people are seeking out Linux for their own valid reasons, they’ll take what they need and leave what they don’t.