I’m not a fan of live albums because I don’t enjoy the idea of listening to an audience per track, before it starts and after it ends. Crowd noises just ruin it for me. I know the idea of live albums is to listen to a band perform at their best, to not make it seem like all that they’re good at is recording at the studio. I get that, but that’s also why you attend concerts when they’re in town for that experience. Why just listen to a live album and pretend that you’re there?
I prefer studio albums because they are made with the band’s art in full scope. It’s all there, with effects that they want, mixing that they want or anything to just let the art flourish through their music as they intended. No I’m not classifying auto-tuning as art, so do not think a second that I’m making it an exception.
And it isn’t like studio albums dings a band’s talent, because being in the studio recording, actually makes a band 100% locked in focus to do what they do. With a live album, a band could have struggling moments or that you might not hear a band perform that well, which could be mixing issues or what have you and ruins what you’re to hear.
Studio albums do it for me more because I can immerse and get lost in them easier, than a live album where the moment I’m hearing crowd noises, I’m taken out of that immersion.
You must log in or # to comment.
I would wager that this is a popular opinion
No, there are music lovers out there who are in hot pursuit of certain live albums from certain bands because they believe those albums are best representations of the bands sound.
I don’t think a subculture of people looking for live music makes this an unpopular opinion. The vast majority of people would and do prefer to play studio music over live recordings. I’m a musician and live music lover and still would select studio albums pretty much every time.
i’ll amend that:
a subculture of people looking for live music <ins>that does not happen to dominate the Fediverse</ins>
Live isn’t to listen at their best - concerts are definitely not that, studio is where you get all the takes and engineering you want.
Live is to hear them play more naturally.
Yeah, this a strange take from OP. I like some live recordings (NIN Mudstock '94 was playing today) but certainly not because the band is inexplicably playing better than they did in the studio
I have been generally impressed with the MTV unplugged stuff, and I think that Alice in Chains’s unplugged album is one of my favorite albums ever, (Korn did a good one too)but I understand abd generally agree with where you are coming from.
This is not unpopular. I’ve literally filled out requests to every music service I’ve ever used to give me a “don’t play live songs” button.
“Oh, you like that song from that studio album? Here’s 2 live versions of it and 6 other live songs from the same band.”
There’s 2 types of live music:
- Recording a concert
- Recording at a venue without an audience present
The latter is vastly superior to the former, and occasionally superior to the studio album.
The following are worth a listen.
- Architects’ “For Those that Wish to Exist at Abbey Road”
- Poets of the Fall’s “Alexander Theater Sessions”
Woah Poets of the Fall in the wild. I’ll add this to check out
Basically I agree. I prefer studio over live. There might be an exception but yeah in the large percentage of the time, it’s studio
While I generally agree, some of the best music ever performed was done so live on stage. You know when it’s their best performance when the audience generally stays silent while they perform.
When the audience generally shuts up, you know it’s good.
Yes, except the Nightwish live album from Wacken 2013.
Generally agree with you, but I have a few selective exceptions and one of my main ones are the 1994 Pink Floyd concert where they - in the video version - bring out the mother of all disco balls during Comfortably Numb
It’s a 10 minute long performance and literally half of the time is the guitar crying in beautiful agony. Just go to the 5 minute mark if you want to hear one of the best guitar solos ever made. And this comes from someone who isn’t really a fan of long guitar solos.
Another live performance that I prefer over the studio recording is Runrig’s Only the Brave. It just feels appropriate that it’s a big crowd for this specific song. It feels like a song that should have a whole stadium of drunk, happy Scotsman singing along. It always brings a teary smile to my face, when I listen to this live recording.
I love music, and i also hate live recordings. The exception for me are jam bands. Grateful Dead, Phish, etc… all have incredible and sometimes even better albums compared to the studio albums. But they are the exception. I have also found some festival recordings of sets ive seen to be really good as well. Outside that i will never put a random live song on unless i was looking for it specifically.
I would agree with you 100%, but there are some exceptions, so I’ll agree 98%. Frampton Comes Alive! is the only way I want hear the songs on this album. The studio versions are lifeless by comparison. The musicians are totally feeding off the crowd and the music is better for it. There is a live version of Tom Petty playing Breakdown where the audio mix of the crowd singing is phenomenal. He even says to the crowd “y’all’re gonna put me out of my job”. It’s just fun. I saw Pink Floyd live once and I was mildly let down. They played all their songs note for note, just like the studio versions. No new riffs, no live in-the-moment feels. I didn’t hate it, mind you, but it was a musical performance by professional musicians instead of a live rock concert. Kind of the opposite of what you’ve described.
While I respect what you’re saying, music as a whole is so broad that I feel you could only make those kinds of arguments for certain styles of music.
For example, jazz is one notable exception where studio album tracks are pretty much recorded in one take without overdubs and are “live” from the studio. Improvising is essential to the music, and musicians interact with the crowd when live. The crowd response informs the notes bring played in a way that would not be possible in a studio.
Certain types of rock also benefit from live recordings, where mistakes and imprecisions convey a certain excitement to the sound!
I always found live recordings of concerts to have the absolute shittiest mixing possible so that absolutely nothing comes through clearly.
I also remember some Garth Brooks song on the radio of a live recording where Garth literally stops like halfway through the song to tell the audience to chill out because the only thing getting picked up was the crowd.
Welp, this is where we differ in opinion. Maybe you folks haven’t seen this yet…
