Tactically, it meant I reduced the risk of Trump winning. Him winning doesn’t mean abstaining from voting would have achieved that end better.
You think this is some kind of gotcha, but you are still just demonstrating a lack of understanding of what tactic’s mean. You can make tactically sound actions and still lose you fucking idiot.
It’s not a “gotcha”. If your goal was to vote out trump, you failed. That tactic did not work. How you evaluate that as tactically sound, I’m not sure.
Furthermore, I think your tactic leaves you in a strategically untenable situation.
Like what, spit it out. What other thing? Hmmm? HMMMM?
I’m guessing you can’t. If its what I think you are suggesting, why should I serve accelerationists? Why should I help them? I fucking hate them. They’re literally working to engineer this result. They wanted this result. FUCK THEM. I hope the leopards eat their faces.
I am saying that objectively looking at the outcome of the election means that running and supporting a pro genocide campaign was a tactical and strategic failure. You shouldn’t do that in the future.
You either don’t understand what tactics mean or you have some really Pepe Silvia shit to share with me.
You voted for genocide and still lost. Tactical and strategic woopsie.
So you don’t understand what tactics are. Or at least are pretending not to.
Ok. How was this successful tactically?
Tactically, it meant I reduced the risk of Trump winning. Him winning doesn’t mean abstaining from voting would have achieved that end better.
You think this is some kind of gotcha, but you are still just demonstrating a lack of understanding of what tactic’s mean. You can make tactically sound actions and still lose you fucking idiot.
It’s not a “gotcha”. If your goal was to vote out trump, you failed. That tactic did not work. How you evaluate that as tactically sound, I’m not sure.
Furthermore, I think your tactic leaves you in a strategically untenable situation.
The alternative tactic… also would have resulted in Trump winning.
So maybe you should try something else
Like what, spit it out. What other thing? Hmmm? HMMMM?
I’m guessing you can’t. If its what I think you are suggesting, why should I serve accelerationists? Why should I help them? I fucking hate them. They’re literally working to engineer this result. They wanted this result. FUCK THEM. I hope the leopards eat their faces.
Everyone has lost, and there’s more genocide.
Well there’s the same amount of genocide. But yes, we agree, and that means voting this way was a tactical and strategic failure.
Same amount in Gaza, more in the US.
Ah yes, because giving Trump the win instead has ended genocide and improved the lives of millions
Jfc you idiot. YOU STILL GAVE TRUMP THE WIN!!
I am saying that objectively looking at the outcome of the election means that running and supporting a pro genocide campaign was a tactical and strategic failure. You shouldn’t do that in the future.
Oh. Yes, agreed