What in the dystopian hell?! 350-square-foot tiny homes…

“You can rent the homes out, cover your mortgage, and get income each month,” he notes. “Those homes can be leased out for a minimum of $1,300 a month.”

Mata says investors rushed in from all over the country, especially from California.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The homes run as small as 350 square feet.

    Mata, who says all the 12 tiny homes he repped sold in less than a year, tells Realtor.com that the typical buyer was a single individual, often a college student or downsizing older person.

    That’s small relative to US houses today, but even the smallest size they have there is 60% larger on a per capita basis, if there’s an individual resident, than houses were in 1900 in the US.

    https://www.windermere.com/blog/how-the-american-home-has-evolved

    Owning a home has been an American tradition from the start. But the home itself has changed dramatically over the years.

    For example, you may be surprised to learn how much the size of the average American home has increased since the turn of the 20th century—especially when you compare it to the size of the average family during the same time period.

    In the year 1900, the average American family was relatively large with 4.6 members, but the average home featured just 1,000 square feet of usable floor space. By 1979, family size had shrunk to 3.11 members, but the floor space they shared had expanded to 1,660 square feet. And by 2007, the average family size was even smaller still—just 2.6 members—while the average home size had increased by the largest amount yet—this time to 2,521 square feet.

    In 1900, 217 square feet per capita.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s small relative to houses back then too. I don’t think there were many 217 sqft houses, we just had more people per household back then.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Per capita is a bit odd for measuring the space in a house too. 5 people don’t need 5 kitchens and bathrooms

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If these were ADU’s or something similar, I’d respect them more. This just looks like typical suburbia but with tiny homes.

      I question why this couldn’t be a set of apartments.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I question why this couldn’t be a set of apartments.

        Yeah, apartment/condo buildings should be the goto rather than tiny homes. The “shared walls” issue is really a “stop cheaping out on sound insulation” issue.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I question why this couldn’t be a set of apartments

        Zoning laws, these could still qualify as free standing single family housing, which in Texas is probably required for most suburbs.