Lets_Disco@retrolemmy.com to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agoViz (UK comic)retrolemmy.comimagemessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up1330arrow-down12
arrow-up1328arrow-down1imageViz (UK comic)retrolemmy.comLets_Disco@retrolemmy.com to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square5linkfedilink
minus-squareBillyClark@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·2 days agoComparatively, in the US, it costs just about that same amount to remove a single foreign object from an uninsured patient’s rectum.
minus-squareAbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoWould it cost different if the object was married? Or even just engaged?
minus-squaremy_hat_stinks@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoYes, but only if they’ve moved in together
minus-squarebear@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoTechnically, the also spends more than the USD equivalent of 300,000 gbp on foreign object removal.
Comparatively, in the US, it costs just about that same amount to remove a single foreign object from an uninsured patient’s rectum.
Would it cost different if the object was married? Or even just engaged?
Yes, but only if they’ve moved in together
Technically, the also spends more than the USD equivalent of 300,000 gbp on foreign object removal.