“break you buy” welp
Why just fathers? Mothers are no less capable of screwing up their kids - ask me how I know.
TBF, tho - they are likely products of generations of poor parenting. We’re just in an age where we’re finally learning how to do better.
bullshit, my grandparents were the best
edit: btw don’t diminish me by commenting like this. it shames me with “what about the bad mothers? why isn’t your post more universal?” and making baseless excuses for my reason to post- no he did have great parents, why would you know that better than the people living near me?
i won’t take that from you, random stranger online
Would be nice if therapy was covered by health insurance…
Even after - or should I say, thanks to - two years of intensive psychodynamic psychotherapy, regardless of what dreams I could’ve fulfilled with all that money, time and emotions, I wouldn’t want my dad to be punished, which making him pay for my therapy would be. His behaviors were a product of his upbringing. And even though I’m angry at some of his behaviors, I simply cannot be mad at him. I’ve tried.
It is in most first world countries.
In my country, which is a prominent first world country, therapy is not covered by health insurance. What’s covered is a doctor’s visit, at which the doctor asks, “are you suicidal?” And if you answer “no”, they tell you to pay for a shrink out of your own pocket.
“Most” - shorthand for “any rational peoples, which obviously excludes the USA.” Almost everything here is subject to aggressive capitalist games - to the point that no matter how much the finance types deny it (and they do - ferociously), you’ll never convince me that “capitalism” doesn’t come from the term “capitalize,” the definition of which is “to take advantage of.”
Isn’t “capitalism” a communist word made for slandering free market though?
Edit:
Also, from my understanding, free market is the potential to grow by one’s own merit, barred only by a State that is there only to organize and defend society, not control it.
And going by grammar, dunno the original meaning of -ism, but nowadays it seems to be related to power or following potential, so capitalism would be power through capital, or chasing after it, with capital iirc being the communist word for money.
If this line of thought is correct, then capitalism would be a gross oversimplification, if not even a very shallow explanation, which would help remove the meaning of the concept to be slandered.
Wat.
There are very well documented definitions of these words. You don’t have to derive their meaning from first principles.
Maybe you could try suing them, if they did hurt you?
